Rutherford Freight Lines, Inc. v. Huff

Sixth Circuit

Rutherford Freight Lines, Inc. v. Huff

126 F.2d 216, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 4103

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided January 16, 1942·No. No. 8881·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause was heard upon the transcript of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel, and i.t appearing that there was substantial evidence to support the verdict and that there was, therefore, no error in the denial of appellant’s motion for a directed verdict; and it further appearing upon a review of the record that the court-committed no prejudicial error in failing to extend or enlarge the charge upon the subject of contributory negligence or in refusing to grant the special request of appellant upon that subject, it is therefore ordered and adjudged that the judgment appealed from be and the same is in all . things affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause was heard upon the transcript of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel, and i.t appearing that there was substantial evidence to support the verdict and that there was, therefore, no error in the denial of appellant’s motion for a directed verdict; and it further appearing upon a review of the record that the court-committed no prejudicial error in failing to extend or enlarge the charge upon the subject of contributory negligence or in refusing to grant the special request of appellant upon that subject, it is therefore ordered and adjudged that the judgment appealed from be and the same is in all . things affirmed.

Rutherford Freight Lines, Inc. v. Huff, 126 F.2d 216, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 4103 (6th Cir. 1942).

Pincite

126 F.2d 216 (Rutherford Freight Lines, Inc. v. Huff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.