Rutherford Freight Lines, Inc. v. Huff

Sixth Circuit

Rutherford Freight Lines, Inc. v. Huff

126 F.2d 216, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 4103

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 16, 1942

DocketNo. 8881

StatusPublished

This text of 126 F.2d 216 (Rutherford Freight Lines, Inc. v. Huff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rutherford Freight Lines, Inc. v. Huff, 126 F.2d 216, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 4103 (6th Cir. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause was heard upon the transcript of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel, and i.t appearing that there was substantial evidence to support the verdict and that there was, therefore, no error in the denial of appellant’s motion for a directed verdict; and it further appearing upon a review of the record that the court-committed no prejudicial error in failing to extend or enlarge the charge upon the subject of contributory negligence or in refusing to grant the special request of appellant upon that subject, it is therefore ordered and adjudged that the judgment appealed from be and the same is in all . things affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause was heard upon the transcript of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel, and i.t appearing that there was substantial evidence to support the verdict and that there was, therefore, no error in the denial of appellant’s motion for a directed verdict; and it further appearing upon a review of the record that the court-committed no prejudicial error in failing to extend or enlarge the charge upon the subject of contributory negligence or in refusing to grant the special request of appellant upon that subject, it is therefore ordered and adjudged that the judgment appealed from be and the same is in all . things affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

126 F.2d 216, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 4103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rutherford-freight-lines-inc-v-huff-ca6-1942.