Rutherford Boiling Springs & Carlstadt Electric Co. v. Franklin Trust Co.
43 A. 1098, 58 N.J. Eq. 584, 1899 N.J. LEXIS 153
This text of 43 A. 1098 (Rutherford Boiling Springs & Carlstadt Electric Co. v. Franklin Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rutherford Boiling Springs & Carlstadt Electric Co. v. Franklin Trust Co., 43 A. 1098, 58 N.J. Eq. 584, 1899 N.J. LEXIS 153 (N.J. 1899).
Opinion
Decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Depue, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Lippincott, Gummere, Ludlow, Collins, Bogert, Nixon, Hendrickson, Adams, Vredenburgh — 14.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
43 A. 1098, 58 N.J. Eq. 584, 1899 N.J. LEXIS 153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rutherford-boiling-springs-carlstadt-electric-co-v-franklin-trust-co-nj-1899.