Rutherford Boiling Springs & Carlstadt Electric Co. v. Franklin Trust Co.

43 A. 1098, 58 N.J. Eq. 584, 1899 N.J. LEXIS 153
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 6, 1899·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Depue, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Lippincott, Gummere, Ludlow, Collins, Bogert, Nixon, Hendrickson, Adams, Vredenburgh — 14.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rutherford Boiling Springs & Carlstadt Electric Co. v. Franklin Trust Co., 43 A. 1098, 58 N.J. Eq. 584, 1899 N.J. LEXIS 153 (N.J. 1899).

43 A. 1098 (Rutherford Boiling Springs & Carlstadt Electric Co. v. Franklin Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.