Ruther v. United States
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1085
L. RUTHER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:07-cv-00475-JRS)
Submitted: April 29, 2010 Decided: May 3, 2010
Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
L. Ruther, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
L. Ruther appeals the district court’s order in his
civil action denying his motion to reconsider the denial of the
court’s earlier order denying his motion for a jury trial. The
district court’s order, denying Ruther’s motion for a new trial,
was filed on August 21, 2008, and Ruther’s motion to reconsider
that order was filed on October 13, 2009. Concluding the motion
to reconsider was untimely filed, the district court denied
relief. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Ruther v. United States, No. 3:07-cv-00475-JRS
(E.D. Va. Dec. 17, 2009). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ruther v. United States (Ruther v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.