Ruther v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
This text of 21 F. App'x 230 (Ruther v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
L. Ruther appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil action under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (West Supp.2001) and motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Ruther v. State Farm Mutual Ins. Co., No. CA-01-671-A (E.D. Va. June 18 & 22, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court *231 and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
21 F. App'x 230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruther-v-state-farm-mutual-automobile-insurance-ca4-2001.