Ruther v. Simmons

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 24, 2007·No. 07-1060·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1060

L. RUTHER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MARK SIMMONS; WEICHERT REALTY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:06-cv-00840)

Submitted: April 19, 2007 Decided: April 24, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lawrence Ruther, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Lawrence Ruther appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his civil action for failure to state a claim under 28

U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2000). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Ruther’s motion to

proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss for the reasons stated by the

district court. Ruther v. Simmons, No. 3:06-cv-00840 (E.D. Va.

Dec. 22, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ruther v. Simmons, (4th Cir. 2007).

Ruther v. Simmons (Ruther v. Simmons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Proceedings in forma pauperis
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)