Ruther v. Interfirst Capital, Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Ruther v. Interfirst Capital, Inc.

29 F. App'x 174

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 21, 2002·No. 01-2184·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

L. Ruther appeals the district court’s orders denying his civil action and motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Ruther v. Interfirst Capital, Inc., No. CA-01-554-A (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 17, 2001 & entered Aug. 20, 2001; filed Sept. 7, 2001 & entered Sept. 13, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

L. Ruther appeals the district court’s orders denying his civil action and motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Ruther v. Interfirst Capital, Inc., No. CA-01-554-A (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 17, 2001 & entered Aug. 20, 2001; filed Sept. 7, 2001 & entered Sept. 13, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Ruther v. Interfirst Capital, Inc., 29 F. App'x 174 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

29 F. App'x 174 (Ruther v. Interfirst Capital, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.