Ruther v. Gash
264 F. Supp. 3d 69
District Court, District of Columbia·Decided August 29, 2017·No. Civil Action No. 17-553 (UNA)·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This matter comes before the Court upon review of plaintiffs application for leave to proceed in forma pawperis and pro se complaint. It appears that plaintiff has filed, and the Court has dismissed, a substantially similar complaint against these same defendants. See Ruther v. Gash, No. 17-cv-1405 (D.D.C. Aug. 14, 2017). The Court will dismiss this civil action without prejudice as duplicative.
An Order is issued separately.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ruther v. Gash, 264 F. Supp. 3d 69 (D.D.C. 2017).
264 F. Supp. 3d 69 (Ruther v. Gash) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ruther v. United States
Federal Claims, 2018