Ruther v. Contreras

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1635

L. RUTHER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CECELIA CONTRERAS; MARK SIMMONS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (3:09-cv-00495-RLW)

Submitted: September 30, 2010 Decided: October 7, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

L. Ruther, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

L. Ruther appeals the district court’s order in his

civil action denying his motion to recuse the district judge.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Ruther v. Contreras, No. 3:09-cv-00495-RLW (E.D. Va.

Oct. 16, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED