Ruther v. Bevin

Fourth Circuit

Ruther v. Bevin

675 F. App'x 324

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 2, 2017

DocketNo. 16-2073

StatusPublished

This text of 675 F. App'x 324 (Ruther v. Bevin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ruther v. Bevin, 675 F. App'x 324 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

L. Ruther appeals the district court’s order summarily dismissing his incomprehensible civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Ruther v. Bevin, No. 1:16-cv-01045-LO-MSN (E.D. Va. Aug. 22, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

L. Ruther appeals the district court’s order summarily dismissing his incomprehensible civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Ruther v. Bevin, No. 1:16-cv-01045-LO-MSN (E.D. Va. Aug. 22, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

675 F. App'x 324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruther-v-bevin-ca4-2017.