Ruthellen Andrews v. Mary Lou Sperry

CourtDistrict Court, C.D. California
DecidedJanuary 10, 2020
Docket8:19-cv-02269
StatusUnknown

This text of Ruthellen Andrews v. Mary Lou Sperry (Ruthellen Andrews v. Mary Lou Sperry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, C.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ruthellen Andrews v. Mary Lou Sperry, (C.D. Cal. 2020).

Opinion

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. SACV 19-02269JVS(DFMx) Date January 10, 2020 Title Ruthellen Andrews, et al v Mary Lou Sperry, et al

Present: The James V. Selna, U.S. District Court Judge Honorable Lisa Bredahl Not Present Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: Not Present Not Present Proceedings: [IN CHAMBERS] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE JURISDICTION The Court has made a preliminary review of the jurisdictional allegations in the: X Amended Complaint filed December 2, 2019 Notice of Removal (“Notice”) by Ruthellen Andrews et al. (“Andrews Parties”).

The initial pleading invokes jurisdiction on the basis of diversity of citizenship, 28 U.S.C. § 1332. (Amended Complaint, ¶ 2.) Jurisdiction on this basis requires complete diversity. The following parties to the action are alleged to be a limited liability companies (“LLC”): C & M Rentals Cliff View LLC For purposes of diversity jurisdiction, an LLC takes on the citizenship of each of its members. Johnson v. Columbia Properties Anchorage , LP, 437 F.3d 894, 899 (9th Cir. 2006); Cosgrove v. Bartolotta, 150 F.3d 729, 731 (7th Cir. 1998); Keith v. Black Diamond Advisors, Inc., 48 F. Supp. 2d 326, 329-30 (S.D. N.Y. 1999). In order to determine diversity, the Court must consider the citizenship of each LLC member, and if a member CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. SACV 19-02269JVS(DFMx) Date January 10, 2020 Title Ruthellen Andrews, et al v Mary Lou Sperry, et al The Andrews Parties are ordered to file an amended initial pleading within 15 days identifying each member of each alleged LLC and the member’s citizenship and principal place of business as the date of the filing of the initial pleading. If any member is itself an LLC, the same information shall be provided for each subtier member, and if need be, for each successive subtier. In addition, among the parties are four trusts: the Andrews Family Children Trust, the Sheflin Family Trust, the Sperry Family Trust, and the Red Rock Trust. When sued or bringing suit, the trust assumes the citizenship of its members. Americord Reallty Trust v. Conagra Foods, Inc., 135 S.Ct. 1012, 1016-17 (2016). The amended pleading shall identify the members of each trust and their citizenship at the time of the filing of the Complaint A failure to respond may result dismissal of the case for lack of jurisdiction.

: 0 Initials of Preparer lmb

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ruthellen Andrews v. Mary Lou Sperry, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruthellen-andrews-v-mary-lou-sperry-cacd-2020.