Ruth v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Ruth v. State

202 S.W.3d 638, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1175, 2006 WL 2128852

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 1, 2006

DocketWD 65371

StatusPublished

This text of 202 S.W.3d 638 (Ruth v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ruth v. State, 202 S.W.3d 638, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1175, 2006 WL 2128852 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Phillip Ruth appeals from a judgment denying his Rule 74.06 motion to re-open post-conviction proceedings. Because Ruth’s motion failed to state a proper claim for relief under Rule 74.06, we affirm the motion court’s judgment.

No precedential purpose would be served by a published opinion, however, we have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision. AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Phillip Ruth appeals from a judgment denying his Rule 74.06 motion to re-open post-conviction proceedings. Because Ruth’s motion failed to state a proper claim for relief under Rule 74.06, we affirm the motion court’s judgment.

No precedential purpose would be served by a published opinion, however, we have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision. AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

202 S.W.3d 638, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1175, 2006 WL 2128852, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruth-v-state-moctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack