Ruth v. State

68 S.W.3d 506, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 2215, 2001 WL 1602042
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 18, 2001·No. No. WD 59533·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

Mr. Phillip A. Ruth appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel in a postconviction relief motion after an evi-dentiary hearing.

For the reasons set forth in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ruth v. State, 68 S.W.3d 506, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 2215, 2001 WL 1602042 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001).

68 S.W.3d 506 (Ruth v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Phillip Ruth v. James A. Gammon
130 F. App'x 65 (Eighth Circuit, 2005)