Ruth v. State
68 S.W.3d 506, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 2215, 2001 WL 1602042
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 18, 2001
DocketNo. WD 59533
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 68 S.W.3d 506 (Ruth v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ruth v. State, 68 S.W.3d 506, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 2215, 2001 WL 1602042 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001).
Opinion
Order
Mr. Phillip A. Ruth appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel in a postconviction relief motion after an evi-dentiary hearing.
For the reasons set forth in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Phillip Ruth v. James A. Gammon
130 F. App'x 65 (Eighth Circuit, 2005)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
68 S.W.3d 506, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 2215, 2001 WL 1602042, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruth-v-state-moctapp-2001.