Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Ruth v. Savannah Electric Co.

Ruth v. Savannah Electric Co.

93 S.E. 499, 20 Ga. App. 672, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 1027
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 26, 1917
Docket8478
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 93 S.E. 499 (Ruth v. Savannah Electric Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ruth v. Savannah Electric Co., 93 S.E. 499, 20 Ga. App. 672, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 1027 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Luke, J.

The evidence did not establish the case as laid By the plaintiff; it was therefore not error for the court to grant a nonsuit.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, O. J., and George, J., concur. Action for damages; from city court of Savannah—judge Davis Freeman. 'December 18, 1916. • Oliver & Oliver, for plaintiff. Osborne, Lawrence & Abrahams, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chambers v. W. L. Florence Construction Co.
36 S.E.2d 69 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
93 S.E. 499, 20 Ga. App. 672, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 1027, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruth-v-savannah-electric-co-gactapp-1917.