Ruth v. Savannah Electric Co.

93 S.E. 499, 20 Ga. App. 672, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 1027
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 26, 1917·No. 8478·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Luke, J.

The evidence did not establish the case as laid By the plaintiff; it was therefore not error for the court to grant a nonsuit.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, O. J., and George, J., concur. Action for damages; from city court of Savannah—judge Davis Freeman. 'December 18, 1916. Oliver & Oliver, for plaintiff. Osborne, Lawrence & Abrahams, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ruth v. Savannah Electric Co., 93 S.E. 499, 20 Ga. App. 672, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 1027 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

93 S.E. 499 (Ruth v. Savannah Electric Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chambers v. W. L. Florence Construction Co.
36 S.E.2d 69 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1945)