Ruth v. Moncrief

764 N.E.2d 1036, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1505, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 673
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 20, 2002
Docket01-2192
StatusPublished

This text of 764 N.E.2d 1036 (Ruth v. Moncrief) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ruth v. Moncrief, 764 N.E.2d 1036, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1505, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 673 (Ohio 2002).

Opinion

Montgomery App. No. 18479. Appeal allowed.

Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

Cross-appeal denied.

Douglas and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
764 N.E.2d 1036, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1505, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 673, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruth-v-moncrief-ohio-2002.