Ruth v. Kempker

Missouri Court of Appeals

Ruth v. Kempker

179 S.W.3d 287, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1637, 2005 WL 2977797

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 8, 2005

DocketWD 64548

StatusPublished

This text of 179 S.W.3d 287 (Ruth v. Kempker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ruth v. Kempker, 179 S.W.3d 287, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1637, 2005 WL 2977797 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Inmate Phillip Ruth appeals the circuit court’s dismissal of his suit for injunctive relief alleging that a Missouri Department of Corrections visitation rule violates inmates’ rights under the United States and Missouri constitutions. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on *288 appeal and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Inmate Phillip Ruth appeals the circuit court’s dismissal of his suit for injunctive relief alleging that a Missouri Department of Corrections visitation rule violates inmates’ rights under the United States and Missouri constitutions. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on *288 appeal and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

179 S.W.3d 287, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1637, 2005 WL 2977797, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruth-v-kempker-moctapp-2005.