Ruth v. City of Creedmoor

Fourth Circuit

Ruth v. City of Creedmoor

623 F. App'x 122

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedNovember 30, 2015

DocketNo. 15-1745

StatusPublished

This text of 623 F. App'x 122 (Ruth v. City of Creedmoor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ruth v. City of Creedmoor, 623 F. App'x 122 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Ruth appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Defendants in his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Ruth v. City of Creedmoor, No. 5:13-cv-00862-BR, 2015 WL 3964797 (E.D.N.C. June 30, 2015). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Ruth appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Defendants in his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Ruth v. City of Creedmoor, No. 5:13-cv-00862-BR, 2015 WL 3964797 (E.D.N.C. June 30, 2015). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

623 F. App'x 122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruth-v-city-of-creedmoor-ca4-2015.