Ruth v. City of Creedmoor

Fourth Circuit

Ruth v. City of Creedmoor

623 F. App'x 122

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 30, 2015·No. No. 15-1745·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Ruth appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Defendants in his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Ruth v. City of Creedmoor, No. 5:13-cv-00862-BR, 2015 WL 3964797 (E.D.N.C. June 30, 2015). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Ruth appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Defendants in his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Ruth v. City of Creedmoor, No. 5:13-cv-00862-BR, 2015 WL 3964797 (E.D.N.C. June 30, 2015). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Ruth v. City of Creedmoor, 623 F. App'x 122 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

623 F. App'x 122 (Ruth v. City of Creedmoor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.