Ruth Matheus v. Citibank N.A.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-13-00162-CV
RUTH MATHEUS APPELLANT
V.
CITIBANK N.A. APPELLEE
------------
FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF TARRANT COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 AND JUDGMENT ------------
We have considered appellant's “Motion to Dismiss Appeal.” It is the
court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the
appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).
Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution
issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. PER CURIAM
PANEL: WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ.
DELIVERED: June 27, 2013
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ruth Matheus v. Citibank N.A. (Ruth Matheus v. Citibank N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.