Ruth Matheus v. Citibank N.A.
This text of Ruth Matheus v. Citibank N.A. (Ruth Matheus v. Citibank N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-13-00162-CV
RUTH MATHEUS APPELLANT
V.
CITIBANK N.A. APPELLEE
------------
FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF TARRANT COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 AND JUDGMENT ------------
We have considered appellant's “Motion to Dismiss Appeal.” It is the
court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the
appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).
Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution
issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. PER CURIAM
PANEL: WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ.
DELIVERED: June 27, 2013
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ruth Matheus v. Citibank N.A., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruth-matheus-v-citibank-na-texapp-2013.