Ruth Matheus v. Citibank N.A.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 27, 2013·No. 02-13-00162-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00162-CV

RUTH MATHEUS APPELLANT

V.

CITIBANK N.A. APPELLEE

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF TARRANT COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 AND JUDGMENT ------------

We have considered appellant's “Motion to Dismiss Appeal.” It is the

court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution

issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. PER CURIAM

PANEL: WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ.

DELIVERED: June 27, 2013

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ruth Matheus v. Citibank N.A., (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Ruth Matheus v. Citibank N.A. (Ruth Matheus v. Citibank N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.