Ruth Maree Lara v. State
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-13-00561-CR
RUTH MAREE LARA APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE
----------
FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION1
Appellant Ruth Maree Lara attempts to appeal from her conviction for
possession of less than one gram of heroin. The trial court’s certification states
that this is “a plea-bargained case and the defendant has NO right of appeal.”
See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). On November 21, 2013, we notified Lara that the
appeal would be dismissed pursuant to the trial court’s certification unless she or
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. any party desiring to continue the appeal filed a response on or before
December 2, 2013, showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R.
App. P. 25.2(d), 44.3. We have not received a response. Therefore, in
accordance with the trial court’s certification, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R.
App. P. 43.2(f).
PER CURIAM
PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.
DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
DELIVERED: January 16, 2014
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ruth Maree Lara v. State (Ruth Maree Lara v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.