Ruth M. Henley v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare

394 F.2d 507, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 6968
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedMay 13, 1968
Docket16916_1
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 394 F.2d 507 (Ruth M. Henley v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ruth M. Henley v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, 394 F.2d 507, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 6968 (3d Cir. 1968).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

The appellant Henley appeals from the granting of summary judgment in favor of the appellee Secretary Celebrezze. On April 16, 1959, Mrs. Henley filed an application with the Department of Health, Education and Welfare to establish a period of disability which would entitle her to benefits under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 416 (i). Her applicatiqn was denied both initially and upon reconsideration. A hearing was granted but the hearing examiner denied Mrs. Henley’s claim based on the testimony and documents presented to him. The Appeals Council of the Social Security Administration declined to review the hearing examiner’s decision. Mrs. Henley brought suit in the court below pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to review the final decision of the Secretary. Relief was refused, and as noted, the court below granted summary judgment for the ap-pellee.

The primary question before the court below and before this court is whether *508 there was substantial evidence in the record to support the hearing examiner’s finding that Mrs. Henley was not “disabled”, as that term is defined in 42 U.S. C. § 423(c) (2) of the Act, on September 30, 1948, the date on which Mrs. Henley last met the earnings requirement of 42 U.S.C. § 423(c) (1) which would entitle her to disability benefits. 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). We agree with the court below that there is substantial evidence in the record to support the finding by the hearing examiner. We also find no merit in the other contentions raised by the appellant.

Accordingly, the judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Torres v. Richardson
369 F. Supp. 1166 (D. Puerto Rico, 1974)
Medina v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH, EDUCATION AND WELFARE
372 F. Supp. 465 (D. Puerto Rico, 1973)
Gaona v. U. S. Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare
339 F. Supp. 219 (D. Puerto Rico, 1972)
Torres v. Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare
337 F. Supp. 1322 (D. Puerto Rico, 1971)
Cancel v. Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare
328 F. Supp. 1356 (D. Puerto Rico, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
394 F.2d 507, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 6968, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruth-m-henley-v-anthony-j-celebrezze-secretary-of-health-education-and-ca3-1968.