Ruth Howard v. Federal National Mortgage Association A/K/A Fannie Mae

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 25, 2013·No. 02-13-00008-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00008-CV

RUTH HOWARD APPELLANT

V.

FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE APPELLEE ASSOCIATION A/K/A FANNIE MAE

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------

On March 15, 2013, we notified appellant that the trial court clerk

responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court that

payment arrangements had not been made to pay for the clerk’s record as

required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.3(a)(2). See Tex. R. App. P.

35.3(a)(2). We stated that we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. unless appellant, within ten days, made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s

record and provided this court with proof of payment.

Because appellant has not made payment arrangements for the clerk’s

record, it is the opinion of the court that the appeal should be dismissed for want

of prosecution. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P.

37.3(b), 42.3(b).

Appellant shall pay all costs of the appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GABRIEL, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J.

DELIVERED: April 25, 2013

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ruth Howard v. Federal National Mortgage Association A/K/A Fannie Mae, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Ruth Howard v. Federal National Mortgage Association A/K/A Fannie Mae (Ruth Howard v. Federal National Mortgage Association A/K/A Fannie Mae) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.