Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Ruth-Hinote v. Calico Jacks USA, Inc.

Ruth-Hinote v. Calico Jacks USA, Inc.

43 So. 3d 764, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 10756, 2010 WL 2853636
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 22, 2010·No. No. 1D09-4709·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Rayner v. Aircraft Spruce-Advantage Inc., 38 So.3d 817, 820 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010) (“[LJack of prejudice, in this context, requires a showing that the new party had knowledge of the lawsuit prior to expiration of the statute of limitations.”).

BENTON, VAN NORTWICK, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ruth-Hinote v. Calico Jacks USA, Inc., 43 So. 3d 764, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 10756, 2010 WL 2853636 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

43 So. 3d 764 (Ruth-Hinote v. Calico Jacks USA, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rayner v. AIRCRAFT SPRUCE-ADVANTAGE INC.
38 So. 3d 817 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)