Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Ruth-Hinote v. Calico Jacks USA, Inc.

Ruth-Hinote v. Calico Jacks USA, Inc.

43 So. 3d 764, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 10756, 2010 WL 2853636
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 22, 2010
DocketNo. 1D09-4709
StatusPublished

This text of 43 So. 3d 764 (Ruth-Hinote v. Calico Jacks USA, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ruth-Hinote v. Calico Jacks USA, Inc., 43 So. 3d 764, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 10756, 2010 WL 2853636 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Rayner v. Aircraft Spruce-Advantage Inc., 38 So.3d 817, 820 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010) (“[LJack of prejudice, in this context, requires a showing that the new party had knowledge of the lawsuit prior to expiration of the statute of limitations.”).

BENTON, VAN NORTWICK, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rayner v. AIRCRAFT SPRUCE-ADVANTAGE INC.
38 So. 3d 817 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
43 So. 3d 764, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 10756, 2010 WL 2853636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruth-hinote-v-calico-jacks-usa-inc-fladistctapp-2010.