Ruth Elizabeth Fabritius v. Unknown Assailants, United States of America

916 F.2d 710, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 19240, 1990 WL 160189
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 24, 1990
Docket90-1772
StatusUnpublished

This text of 916 F.2d 710 (Ruth Elizabeth Fabritius v. Unknown Assailants, United States of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ruth Elizabeth Fabritius v. Unknown Assailants, United States of America, 916 F.2d 710, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 19240, 1990 WL 160189 (4th Cir. 1990).

Opinion

916 F.2d 710
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Ruth Elizabeth FABRITIUS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNKNOWN ASSAILANTS, United States of America, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 90-1772.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 1, 1990.
Decided Oct. 24, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-90-289-AR)

Ruth Elizabeth Fabritius, appellant pro se.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before DONALD RUSSELL and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Ruth Elizabeth Fabritius appeals from the district court's order dismissing her civil suit as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915(d). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Fabritius v. Unknown Assailants, CA-90-289-AR (E.D.Va. May 17, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
916 F.2d 710, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 19240, 1990 WL 160189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruth-elizabeth-fabritius-v-unknown-assailants-unit-ca4-1990.