Ruth Bartlett v. Alexander Theriot
This text of Ruth Bartlett v. Alexander Theriot (Ruth Bartlett v. Alexander Theriot) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
______________________________
No. 06-07-00146-CV ______________________________
RUTH BARTLETT, Appellant
V.
ALEXANDER THERIOT, Appellee
On Appeal from the 76th Judicial District Court Titus County, Texas Trial Court No. 32,023
Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley MEMORANDUM OPINION
Ruth Bartlett has filed her pro se notice of appeal from the trial court's judgment of
November 16, 2007. No clerk's record has been received by this Court.
The district clerk of Titus County has now notified this Court that Bartlett's motion for new
trial was granted by the trial court on February 29, 2008, and this cause has been set for a jury trial.
Because Bartlett's motion for new trial was granted, her appeal is now moot. See, e.g.,
Garcia-Udall v. Udall, 141 S.W.3d 323, 332 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2004, no pet.); Zapata v.
Rosenfeld, 811 S.W.2d 182, 183 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1991, writ denied).
Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.
Bailey C. Moseley Justice
Date Submitted: March 31, 2008 Date Decided: April 1, 2008
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ruth Bartlett v. Alexander Theriot, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruth-bartlett-v-alexander-theriot-texapp-2008.