Ruth Bartlett v. Alexander Theriot
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
______________________________
No. 06-07-00146-CV ______________________________
RUTH BARTLETT, Appellant
V.
ALEXANDER THERIOT, Appellee
On Appeal from the 76th Judicial District Court Titus County, Texas Trial Court No. 32,023
Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley MEMORANDUM OPINION
Ruth Bartlett has filed her pro se notice of appeal from the trial court's judgment of
November 16, 2007. No clerk's record has been received by this Court.
The district clerk of Titus County has now notified this Court that Bartlett's motion for new
trial was granted by the trial court on February 29, 2008, and this cause has been set for a jury trial.
Because Bartlett's motion for new trial was granted, her appeal is now moot. See, e.g.,
Garcia-Udall v. Udall, 141 S.W.3d 323, 332 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2004, no pet.); Zapata v.
Rosenfeld, 811 S.W.2d 182, 183 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1991, writ denied).
Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.
Bailey C. Moseley Justice
Date Submitted: March 31, 2008 Date Decided: April 1, 2008
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ruth Bartlett v. Alexander Theriot (Ruth Bartlett v. Alexander Theriot) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.