Ruth Ann Woods-Seward, Appellant/Cross-Appellee v. City of Coffee City, Texas, Appellee/Cross-Appellant

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 18, 2005·No. 12-05-00117-CV·Published

Opinion

                     NO. 12-05-00117-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS


TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT


TYLER, TEXAS



RUTH ANN WOODS-SEWARD,

APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE                  §     APPEAL FROM THE 392ND



V.                                                                         §     JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF


CITY OF COFFEE CITY, TEXAS,

APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT                  §     HENDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS






MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

            Appellant and Appellee/Counter Appellant have filed a joint motion to dismiss their appeals. In their motion, the parties represent that they have reached a settlement agreement that resolves all issues in their respective appeals. Because the parties have met the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(2), the motion is granted, and the respective appeals are dismissed.

Opinion delivered May 18, 2005.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and DeVasto, J.



(PUBLISH)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ruth Ann Woods-Seward, Appellant/Cross-Appellee v. City of Coffee City, Texas, Appellee/Cross-Appellant, (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Ruth Ann Woods-Seward, Appellant/Cross-Appellee v. City of Coffee City, Texas, Appellee/Cross-Appellant (Ruth Ann Woods-Seward, Appellant/Cross-Appellee v. City of Coffee City, Texas, Appellee/Cross-Appellant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.