Rutgers v. Martin
23 A.2d 406, 127 N.J.L. 603, 1942 N.J. LEXIS 220
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Donges in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Parker, Bodine, Pbrskie, P-orter, Colie, Dear, Wells, Woles-Keil, Raeeerty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rutgers v. Martin, 23 A.2d 406, 127 N.J.L. 603, 1942 N.J. LEXIS 220 (N.J. 1942).
23 A.2d 406 (Rutgers v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the Estate of Roth
6 N.J. Tax 455 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1984)
In Re Estate of Lichtenstein
247 A.2d 320 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1968)