Rutgers v. Kugler
This text of 275 A.2d 441 (Rutgers v. Kugler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
GEORGE F. KUGLER, JR., ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mr. Alfred L. Nardelli, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for the appellant (Mr. George F. Kugler, Jr., Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Mr. Stephen Skillman, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel).
Mr. Clyde A. Szuch argued the cause for the respondent (Pitney, Hardin & Kipp, attorneys; Mr. Clyde A. Szuch and Mr. Joel A. Wolff, on the brief).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed essentially for the reasons expressed by Judge R.C. Brown in the Law Division, 110 N.J. Super. 424 (1970).
For affirmance Justices JACOBS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and MOUNTAIN 5.
For reversal None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
275 A.2d 441, 58 N.J. 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rutgers-v-kugler-nj-1971.