Rutgers Assn. of Beta Theta Pi v. New Brunswick
21 A.2d 732, 127 N.J.L. 234, 1941 N.J. LEXIS 251
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, BODINE, PERSKIE, PORTER, COLIE, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, THOMPSON, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None. *Page 235
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rutgers Assn. of Beta Theta Pi v. New Brunswick, 21 A.2d 732, 127 N.J.L. 234, 1941 N.J. LEXIS 251 (N.J. 1941).
21 A.2d 732 (Rutgers Assn. of Beta Theta Pi v. New Brunswick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.