Rutgers Assn. of Beta Theta Pi v. New Brunswick
21 A.2d 732, 127 N.J.L. 234, 1941 N.J. LEXIS 251
This text of 21 A.2d 732 (Rutgers Assn. of Beta Theta Pi v. New Brunswick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rutgers Assn. of Beta Theta Pi v. New Brunswick, 21 A.2d 732, 127 N.J.L. 234, 1941 N.J. LEXIS 251 (N.J. 1941).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, BODINE, PERSKIE, PORTER, COLIE, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, THOMPSON, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None. *Page 235
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
21 A.2d 732, 127 N.J.L. 234, 1941 N.J. LEXIS 251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rutgers-assn-of-beta-theta-pi-v-new-brunswick-nj-1941.