Rutgers Ass'n of Beta Theta Pi v. City of New Brunswick

127 N.J.L. 234
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedSeptember 19, 1941
StatusPublished

This text of 127 N.J.L. 234 (Rutgers Ass'n of Beta Theta Pi v. City of New Brunswick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rutgers Ass'n of Beta Theta Pi v. City of New Brunswick, 127 N.J.L. 234 (N.J. 1941).

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion per curiam in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — -The Chancellob, Chiee Justice, Paekee, Bodine, Peeskie, Poetee, Colie, Deae, Wells, Woles-Keil, Raeeeety, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
127 N.J.L. 234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rutgers-assn-of-beta-theta-pi-v-city-of-new-brunswick-nj-1941.