Rutgers Ass'n of Beta Theta Pi v. City of New Brunswick
127 N.J.L. 234
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — -The Chancellob, Chiee Justice, Paekee, Bodine, Peeskie, Poetee, Colie, Deae, Wells, Woles-Keil, Raeeeety, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rutgers Ass'n of Beta Theta Pi v. City of New Brunswick, 127 N.J.L. 234 (N.J. 1941).
127 N.J.L. 234 (Rutgers Ass'n of Beta Theta Pi v. City of New Brunswick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.