Ruston v. Administrators of Dunwoody

1 Binn. 42, 1803 Pa. LEXIS 7
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 14, 1803
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 Binn. 42 (Ruston v. Administrators of Dunwoody) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ruston v. Administrators of Dunwoody, 1 Binn. 42, 1803 Pa. LEXIS 7 (Pa. 1803).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Rules of reference should not lightly be struck off, after a party has felt the pulse of the referees at a meeting, and concessions have heen-jnade which cannot be afterwards used. Upon the circumstances of this case we must continue the rule of reference.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Robinson v. Bickley
30 Pa. 384 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1858)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Binn. 42, 1803 Pa. LEXIS 7, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruston-v-administrators-of-dunwoody-pa-1803.