Ruston Paving Co. v. James V. Spano, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ruston Paving Co. v. James V. Spano, Inc.

168 A.D.2d 905, 566 N.Y.S.2d 554, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16424

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 21, 1990

StatusPublished

This text of 168 A.D.2d 905 (Ruston Paving Co. v. James V. Spano, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ruston Paving Co. v. James V. Spano, Inc., 168 A.D.2d 905, 566 N.Y.S.2d 554, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16424 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by Seneca Stone Corporation from so much of the order relating to contract price unanimously dismissed as moot and order otherwise affirmed all without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: With respect to action No. 2, the parties have stipulated that the reasonable value of the materials supplied by Seneca Stone Corporation (Seneca) was $27,445. Seneca acknowledges that, during the pendency of this appeal, it received payment in that amount from Ruston Paving Company, Inc. Accordingly, Seneca’s appeal with respect to this issue is dismissed as moot. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Seneca County, DePasquale, J.—finance charges.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Denman, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by Seneca Stone Corporation from so much of the order relating to contract price unanimously dismissed as moot and order otherwise affirmed all without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: With respect to action No. 2, the parties have stipulated that the reasonable value of the materials supplied by Seneca Stone Corporation (Seneca) was $27,445. Seneca acknowledges that, during the pendency of this appeal, it received payment in that amount from Ruston Paving Company, Inc. Accordingly, Seneca’s appeal with respect to this issue is dismissed as moot. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Seneca County, DePasquale, J.—finance charges.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Denman, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

168 A.D.2d 905, 566 N.Y.S.2d 554, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruston-paving-co-v-james-v-spano-inc-nyappdiv-1990.