Rustom v. Sparling

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rustom v. Sparling

685 So. 2d 90, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 55, 1997 WL 1570

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 2, 1997

DocketNo. 96-0769

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 685 So. 2d 90 (Rustom v. Sparling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rustom v. Sparling, 685 So. 2d 90, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 55, 1997 WL 1570 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse and remand that portion of the final judgment entered by the trial court, which finds certain notes and the mortgage prepared by the husband in favor of his father, a non-party, to be invalid. The trial court may not adjudicate the rights of a non-party.

We affirm the final judgment in all other respects, and specifically affirm that portion ordering the husband to clear' the title of the subject property or to bear the fees and costs in the event the wife is required to clear the title.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART.

DELL, STONE and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI