Rustin v. Torres
This text of Rustin v. Torres (Rustin v. Torres) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6012
GREGORY OLIVER RUSTIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WILLIAM TORRES, Doctor; COUNTY OF HENRICO SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-01-441-3)
Submitted: May 16, 2002 Decided: May 31, 2002
Before WILLIAMS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gregory Oliver Rustin, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Joseph McNelis, III, RAWLS & MCNELIS, P.C., Richmond, Virginia; Jacqueline Guess Epps, MORRIS & MORRIS, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Gregory Oliver Rustin appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001)
complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. Rustin v. Torres, No. CA-01-441-3
(E.D. Va. Dec. 19, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rustin v. Torres, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rustin-v-torres-ca4-2002.