Rust v. Rowe

New York Supreme Court

Rust v. Rowe

1 How. Pr. 46

DecidedDecember 15, 1844

StatusPublished

This text of 1 How. Pr. 46 (Rust v. Rowe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rust v. Rowe, 1 How. Pr. 46 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1844).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Since notice was, given of the motion the plaintiff has served a sufficient bill of particulars. He has now confined his claim to the balance found in his favor on an account stated between the parties in 1839, which account consisted of five items for cash lent and advanced to the defendant; interest is also claimed, dates and sums are given with sufficient particularity. The motion is therefore denied .on the plaintiff’s paying $ 10 costs of the same. Rule accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Since notice was, given of the motion the plaintiff has served a sufficient bill of particulars. He has now confined his claim to the balance found in his favor on an account stated between the parties in 1839, which account consisted of five items for cash lent and advanced to the defendant; interest is also claimed, dates and sums are given with sufficient particularity. The motion is therefore denied .on the plaintiff’s paying $ 10 costs of the same. Rule accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 How. Pr. 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rust-v-rowe-nysupct-1844.