Russom v. State

143 S.E. 624, 38 Ga. App. 239, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 159
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 12, 1928
Docket18866
StatusPublished

This text of 143 S.E. 624 (Russom v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Russom v. State, 143 S.E. 624, 38 Ga. App. 239, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 159 (Ga. Ct. App. 1928).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the denial of the motion for a new trial, based upon the usual general grounds, was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luhe and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
143 S.E. 624, 38 Ga. App. 239, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russom-v-state-gactapp-1928.