Russo v. Weisbecker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Russo v. Weisbecker

42 A.D.2d 911, 347 N.Y.S.2d 566, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3548

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 24, 1973

StatusPublished

This text of 42 A.D.2d 911 (Russo v. Weisbecker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Russo v. Weisbecker, 42 A.D.2d 911, 347 N.Y.S.2d 566, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3548 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated Deceniber 18,1972, as, upon reconsideration, denied their motion for a general preference. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $20 costs and disbursements. In our opinion, the nature and extent of the plaintiffs’ disabilities do not reasonably warrant an evaluation in excess of the monetary jurisdiction of the Civil Court of the City of Few York. Accordingly, a general preference was properly denied. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Latham, Gulotta, Christ and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated Deceniber 18,1972, as, upon reconsideration, denied their motion for a general preference. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $20 costs and disbursements. In our opinion, the nature and extent of the plaintiffs’ disabilities do not reasonably warrant an evaluation in excess of the monetary jurisdiction of the Civil Court of the City of Few York. Accordingly, a general preference was properly denied. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Latham, Gulotta, Christ and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 A.D.2d 911, 347 N.Y.S.2d 566, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3548, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russo-v-weisbecker-nyappdiv-1973.