Russo v. Schieber

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Russo v. Schieber

8 A.D.2d 986, 191 N.Y.S.2d 146, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7523

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 28, 1959

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 8 A.D.2d 986 (Russo v. Schieber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Russo v. Schieber, 8 A.D.2d 986, 191 N.Y.S.2d 146, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7523 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Action by a pedestrian to recover damages for personal injuries received when she was struck by a dog which jumped or fell from a window of an abutting building, and by her husband for medical expenses and loss of services, against the owner of the dog (Albert Schieber) and the lessee of the building (Ridgewood Keeno Corp.) from which the dog jumped or fell, The court after trial without a jury awarded $23,500 for personal injuries and $1,500 for medical expenses and loss of services. Defendants appeal from the judgment entered thereon, and plaintiffs appeal from said judgment on the ground of inadequacy. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldoek, Murphy, Ughetta and Kleinfeld, JJ. [11 Misc 2d 842.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action by a pedestrian to recover damages for personal injuries received when she was struck by a dog which jumped or fell from a window of an abutting building, and by her husband for medical expenses and loss of services, against the owner of the dog (Albert Schieber) and the lessee of the building (Ridgewood Keeno Corp.) from which the dog jumped or fell, The court after trial without a jury awarded $23,500 for personal injuries and $1,500 for medical expenses and loss of services. Defendants appeal from the judgment entered thereon, and plaintiffs appeal from said judgment on the ground of inadequacy. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldoek, Murphy, Ughetta and Kleinfeld, JJ. [11 Misc 2d 842.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 A.D.2d 986, 191 N.Y.S.2d 146, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7523, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russo-v-schieber-nyappdiv-1959.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack