Russo v. Scherer

222 A.D.2d 665, 635 N.Y.S.2d 671, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13936
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 29, 1995·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.), dated September 27, 1994, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the plaintiffs raised an issue of fact as to whether the injured plaintiff suffered a "serious injury” within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), by demonstrating a medically determined injury or impairment of a non-permanent nature which prevented her from performing substantially all of the material acts which constituted her usual and customary daily activities for not less than 90 days during the 180 days immediately following the occurrence of the injury or impairment. Balletta, J. P., Rosenblatt, Pizzuto, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russo v. Scherer, 222 A.D.2d 665, 635 N.Y.S.2d 671, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13936 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

222 A.D.2d 665 (Russo v. Scherer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hoo v. Uribe
248 A.D.2d 440 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)