Russo v. Russo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Russo v. Russo

47 A.D.2d 913, 369 N.Y.S.2d 374, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9345

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 14, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 47 A.D.2d 913 (Russo v. Russo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Russo v. Russo, 47 A.D.2d 913, 369 N.Y.S.2d 374, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9345 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered January 15, 1975, which inter alla granted her a divorce. By written stipulation, dated April 2, 1975, the parties, through their attorneys, have agreed to specific modifications of the judgment. In accordance with the stipulation, the judgment is modified, without costs, by (1) increasing the counsel fee awarded therein to a total of $5,000 and (2) requiring defendant to obtain term insurance on his life, naming plaintiff as beneficiary, or, alternatively, requiring him to assign any existing life insurance policy to plaintiff, the face amount of the policy to be not less than $25,000, and all premiums to be paid by plaintiff. Gulotta, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Martuscello and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered January 15, 1975, which inter alla granted her a divorce. By written stipulation, dated April 2, 1975, the parties, through their attorneys, have agreed to specific modifications of the judgment. In accordance with the stipulation, the judgment is modified, without costs, by (1) increasing the counsel fee awarded therein to a total of $5,000 and (2) requiring defendant to obtain term insurance on his life, naming plaintiff as beneficiary, or, alternatively, requiring him to assign any existing life insurance policy to plaintiff, the face amount of the policy to be not less than $25,000, and all premiums to be paid by plaintiff. Gulotta, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Martuscello and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

47 A.D.2d 913, 369 N.Y.S.2d 374, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russo-v-russo-nyappdiv-1975.