Russo v. Ratner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Russo v. Ratner

84 A.D.2d 563, 443 N.Y.S.2d 268, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15638

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 19, 1981

StatusPublished

This text of 84 A.D.2d 563 (Russo v. Ratner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Russo v. Ratner, 84 A.D.2d 563, 443 N.Y.S.2d 268, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15638 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Commissioner of the Department of Consumer Affairs revoking petitioner’s commercial refuse removal license, the appeal (by permission) is from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jones, J.), dated August 11, 1980, which, inter alia, annulled the determination and remitted the matter to the appellant commissioner for further proceedings. The appeal brings up for review so much of an order of the same court dated November 21, 1980, as, upon granting appellant’s motion to reargue, adhered to its original decision. Appeal from the order dated August 11,1980 dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements. Said order was superseded by the subsequent order granting reargument. Order dated November 21, 1980 reversed, insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements, order dated August 11, 1980 vacated and proceeding dismissed. The order revoking petitioner’s license was dated February 19,1980 and received February 22, 1980, to become effective March 6, 1980. This proceeding was not commenced until July 9,1980, more than four months later (see CPLR 217) and is therefore time barred. Damiani, J. P., Gulotta, Margett and Bracken, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Commissioner of the Department of Consumer Affairs revoking petitioner’s commercial refuse removal license, the appeal (by permission) is from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jones, J.), dated August 11, 1980, which, inter alia, annulled the determination and remitted the matter to the appellant commissioner for further proceedings. The appeal brings up for review so much of an order of the same court dated November 21, 1980, as, upon granting appellant’s motion to reargue, adhered to its original decision. Appeal from the order dated August 11,1980 dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements. Said order was superseded by the subsequent order granting reargument. Order dated November 21, 1980 reversed, insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements, order dated August 11, 1980 vacated and proceeding dismissed. The order revoking petitioner’s license was dated February 19,1980 and received February 22, 1980, to become effective March 6, 1980. This proceeding was not commenced until July 9,1980, more than four months later (see CPLR 217) and is therefore time barred. Damiani, J. P., Gulotta, Margett and Bracken, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

84 A.D.2d 563, 443 N.Y.S.2d 268, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15638, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russo-v-ratner-nyappdiv-1981.