Russo v. Nunez
This text of 251 A.D.2d 162 (Russo v. Nunez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County [163]*163(George Friedman, J.), entered on or about June 13, 1997, which granted plaintiffs’ motion to set aside the verdict in defendant’s favor and ordered the matter restored to the trial calendar, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
In this case concerning an automobile accident at an intersection, we agree with the trial court that the jury’s verdict finding that defendant, although negligent, did not cause the accident, was “irreconcilably inconsistent” (Pimpinella v McSwegan, 213 AD2d 232, 233). The evidence simply did not permit the jury to conclude both that defendant had been negligent and that his negligence was not a cause of the accident. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Rubin, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
251 A.D.2d 162, 673 N.Y.S.2d 911, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russo-v-nunez-nyappdiv-1998.