Russo v. Mock

721 So. 2d 722, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 603, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 2205, 1998 WL 821783
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided November 25, 1998·No. No. 91954·Published

Opinion

SHAW, Justice.

We have for review Russo v. Mock, 701 So.2d 898 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997) (hereinafter Mock), wherein the district court cited for support Russo v. Akers, 701 So.2d 366 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997) (hereinafter Akers), which was pending in this Court. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

We have since approved the district court decision in Akers. See Russo v. Akers, No. 91,943, — So.2d -, 1998 WL 821778 (Fla. Nov. 25, 1998) (holding that a trial court can appoint a public defender to represent an [723] indigent defendant in a noncapital proceeding under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850). Accordingly we approve the result in Mock.

It is so ordered.

HARDING, C.J., and OVERTON, KOGAN, WELLS, ANSTEAD and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russo v. Mock, 721 So. 2d 722, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 603, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 2205, 1998 WL 821783 (Fla. 1998).

721 So. 2d 722 (Russo v. Mock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Russo v. Akers
724 So. 2d 1151 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)
Russo v. Akers
701 So. 2d 366 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Russo v. Mock
701 So. 2d 898 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)