Russo v. Lupow
This text of 215 A.D.2d 744 (Russo v. Lupow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a legal malpractice action, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.), dated February 10, 1993, which denied their motion to compel the production of certain documents.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contention, the Supreme Court properly concluded that the requested documents constituted attorney work product and therefore were not subject to discovery (see, CPLR 3101 [c]). Sullivan, J. P., Miller, Joy and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
215 A.D.2d 744, 627 N.Y.S.2d 959, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5773, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russo-v-lupow-nyappdiv-1995.