Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Russo v. Huisking Holding Corp.

Russo v. Huisking Holding Corp.

251 A.D. 886, 298 N.Y.S. 511, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8163
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 2, 1937·Published

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals or for a reargument denied, with ten dollars costs. Motion for a stay granted pending the granting or final refusal by the Court of Appeals of leave to appeal, upon appellant’s filing the undertaking [887]*887required by section 593 of the Civil Practice Act. Present—■ Martin, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russo v. Huisking Holding Corp., 251 A.D. 886, 298 N.Y.S. 511, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8163 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

251 A.D. 886 (Russo v. Huisking Holding Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.