Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Russo v. Germain Motor Co.

Russo v. Germain Motor Co.

939 So. 2d 212, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 16917, 2006 WL 2872488
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 11, 2006
DocketNo. 1D06-3458
StatusPublished

This text of 939 So. 2d 212 (Russo v. Germain Motor Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Russo v. Germain Motor Co., 939 So. 2d 212, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 16917, 2006 WL 2872488 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner has failed to carry his burden of demonstrating the existence of irreparable injury. Accordingly, his petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Gour[213]*213ley v. Szabo, 869 So.2d 765 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); Bared & Co. v. McGuire, 670 So.2d 153 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (en banc).

DISMISSED.

WEBSTER, VAN NORTWICK, and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gourley v. Szabo
869 So. 2d 765 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Bared & Co., Inc. v. McGuire
670 So. 2d 153 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
939 So. 2d 212, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 16917, 2006 WL 2872488, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russo-v-germain-motor-co-fladistctapp-2006.