Russo v. Germain Motor Co.

939 So. 2d 212, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 16917, 2006 WL 2872488
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 11, 2006·No. No. 1D06-3458·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner has failed to carry his burden of demonstrating the existence of irreparable injury. Accordingly, his petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Gour[213]*213ley v. Szabo, 869 So.2d 765 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); Bared & Co. v. McGuire, 670 So.2d 153 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (en banc).

DISMISSED.

WEBSTER, VAN NORTWICK, and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russo v. Germain Motor Co., 939 So. 2d 212, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 16917, 2006 WL 2872488 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

939 So. 2d 212 (Russo v. Germain Motor Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gourley v. Szabo
869 So. 2d 765 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Bared & Co., Inc. v. McGuire
670 So. 2d 153 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)