Russo v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Russo v. City of New York

89 A.D.2d 522, 452 N.Y.S.2d 318, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17563

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 8, 1982

StatusPublished

This text of 89 A.D.2d 522 (Russo v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Russo v. City of New York, 89 A.D.2d 522, 452 N.Y.S.2d 318, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17563 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Miller, J.), entered on December 9, 1980, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to the extent of reversing the judgment in favor of plaintiff Victor Russo; a new trial ordered only on the issue of damages awarded to said plaintiff, without costs and without disbursements; and said judgment is otherwise affirmed, unless plaintiff Victor Russo, within 20 days after service upon him of a copy of the order to be entered herein, with notice of entry, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict in his favor to $10,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If plaintiff Victor Russo so stipulates, the judgment, as so amended and reduced, is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. After review of the record, the damages awarded to Victor Russo, appear to us to be excessive to the extent indicated. Concur —• Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Markewich, Silverman and Asch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Miller, J.), entered on December 9, 1980, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to the extent of reversing the judgment in favor of plaintiff Victor Russo; a new trial ordered only on the issue of damages awarded to said plaintiff, without costs and without disbursements; and said judgment is otherwise affirmed, unless plaintiff Victor Russo, within 20 days after service upon him of a copy of the order to be entered herein, with notice of entry, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict in his favor to $10,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If plaintiff Victor Russo so stipulates, the judgment, as so amended and reduced, is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. After review of the record, the damages awarded to Victor Russo, appear to us to be excessive to the extent indicated. Concur —• Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Markewich, Silverman and Asch, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 A.D.2d 522, 452 N.Y.S.2d 318, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17563, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russo-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1982.