Russo v. Board of Education of the Wantagh Union Free School District

259 A.D.2d 703, 686 N.Y.S.2d 836, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2721
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 22, 1999
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 259 A.D.2d 703 (Russo v. Board of Education of the Wantagh Union Free School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Russo v. Board of Education of the Wantagh Union Free School District, 259 A.D.2d 703, 686 N.Y.S.2d 836, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2721 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Board of Education of the Wantagh Union Free School District, dated June 3, 1997, which modified the recommendation of a Hearing Officer, made after a hearing, found the petitioner guilty of the disciplinary charges of misconduct and incompetence concerning a smoke condition in the school at which he was employed, and terminated his employment.

[704]*704Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

The determination of the respondent Board of Education that the petitioner, an elementary school custodian, was guilty of disciplinary charges of misconduct and incompetence concerning a smoke condition in the school at which he was employed, was supported by substantial evidence on the record (see, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222; Matter of Bullock v State of New York Dept, of Social Servs., 248 AD2d 380). Further, under the circumstances of this case, the termination of the petitioner’s employment was not so disproportionate to the offense as to shock one’s sense of fairness (see, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., supra). A fire began in the custodians’ area of the petitioner’s school, caused by cigarettes igniting waste paper in a plastic trash pail which had not been emptied, and necessitated the evacuation of the students.

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Thompson and Joy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Kimble v. Yonkers Bd. of Educ.
186 N.Y.S.3d 247 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
259 A.D.2d 703, 686 N.Y.S.2d 836, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2721, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russo-v-board-of-education-of-the-wantagh-union-free-school-district-nyappdiv-1999.