Russin v. Richard F. Greminger, P.A.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Russin v. Richard F. Greminger, P.A.

563 So. 2d 1089, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3885, 1990 WL 70618

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 30, 1990

DocketNo. 89-0980

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 563 So. 2d 1089 (Russin v. Richard F. Greminger, P.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Russin v. Richard F. Greminger, P.A., 563 So. 2d 1089, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3885, 1990 WL 70618 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of a final judgment awarding appellee punitive damages in an action for tortious interference with a business relationship, but awarding no compensatory damages. The record supports the trial court’s finding that appellant had engaged in willful and malicious conduct which had as its purpose harassment and interference with the appellee’s plastic surgery practice. We affirm on the authority of Ault v. Lohr, 538 So.2d 454 (Fla.1989).

On cross-appeal, appellee contends the trial court erred by failing to provide for the disposition of escrow funds which the record shows represented payment for services rendered by the appellee. We agree and remand this cause to the trial court with instructions to amend its final judgment to award the escrow funds to the appellee.

AFFIRMED.

GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., and SALMON, MICHAEL H., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI