Russello v. Washington Five-O Five-O, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Russello v. Washington Five-O Five-O, Inc.

236 A.D. 824

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 1932

StatusPublished

This text of 236 A.D. 824 (Russello v. Washington Five-O Five-O, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Russello v. Washington Five-O Five-O, Inc., 236 A.D. 824 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Order entered July 30, 1932, modified by granting leave to renew, and as so modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the respondent. Order entered September 23, 1932, reversed and motion granted opening default and permitting defendant’s answer filed to stand as the answer to the complaint, upon payment, however, of all costs to date, including ten dollars costs and disbursements on the appeal from the order entered July 30, 1932, and ten dollars costs and disbursements of this appeal. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order entered July 30, 1932, modified by granting leave to renew, and as so modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the respondent. Order entered September 23, 1932, reversed and motion granted opening default and permitting defendant’s answer filed to stand as the answer to the complaint, upon payment, however, of all costs to date, including ten dollars costs and disbursements on the appeal from the order entered July 30, 1932, and ten dollars costs and disbursements of this appeal. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

236 A.D. 824, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russello-v-washington-five-o-five-o-inc-nyappdiv-1932.