Russell Wayne Moore v. the State of Texas
This text of Russell Wayne Moore v. the State of Texas (Russell Wayne Moore v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-23-00174-CR
RUSSELL WAYNE MOORE, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 207th District Court Comal County, Texas Trial Court No. CR2020-739, Honorable Glenn Devlin, Presiding
January 12, 2024 ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND 1 Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and DOSS, JJ.
Appellant, Russell Wayne Moore, appeals from his conviction by jury of the first-
degree felony offense of murder and the resulting life sentence. His appointed counsel
on appeal subsequently filed a motion to withdraw supported by an Anders2 brief. Having
found at least one arguable issue warranting appeal, we grant counsel’s motion to
1 Because this matter was transferred from the Third Court of Appeals, we apply its precedent when
it conflicts with that of the Seventh Court of Appeals. TEX. R. APP. P. 41.3. 2 See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2 493 (1967). withdraw and remand the cause to the trial court for appointment of new appellate
counsel.
Appellate counsel filed an Anders brief that discussed her duty under the law and
her evaluation of the record. She also identified several potential issues, ultimately
determining each was frivolous. However, our independent review revealed an arguable
issue concerning the quantum of evidence corroborating the accomplice witness
testimony. We make no comment on the ultimate meritoriousness of the issue, but rather
conclude it sufficient to at least be non-frivolous. See Davis v. State, No. 07-23-00143-
CR, 2023 Tex. App. LEXIS 9443, at *2-4 (Tex. App.—Amarillo Dec. 19, 2023) (order)
(noting need for caution by attorneys in filing Anders briefs and directive to do so only
when issues truly lack merit).
Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, abate the proceeding, and
remand the cause to the trial court. On remand, the trial court shall, by written order,
appoint new counsel to represent appellant on appeal. The name, address, email
address, telephone number, and State Bar number of newly appointed counsel must be
specified in the order. The trial court will then cause its order to be filed in a supplemental
clerk’s record with the clerk of this court no later than February 10, 2024.
The deadline by which newly appointed counsel must file an appellant’s or other
brief addressing the aforementioned issue, and any other arguable issue discovered, is
March 22, 2024, unless otherwise extended by the court. Newly appointed counsel may
also request the supplementation of the appellate record as needed. Such
supplementation, if any, must be requested before March 1, 2024. See TEX. R. APP. P.
34.5(c), 34.6(d)
2 It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Russell Wayne Moore v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russell-wayne-moore-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.