Russell Wayne McSland v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 8, 2015
Docket13-15-00054-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Russell Wayne McSland v. State (Russell Wayne McSland v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Russell Wayne McSland v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-15-00054-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

RUSSELL WAYNE McSLAND, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 24th District Court of Jackson County, Texas.

ORDER Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Perkes Order Per Curiam

Appellant’s brief was originally due to be filed on June 15, 2015. Pursuant to

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(b)(2), on June 19, 2015, the Clerk of the Court

notified appellant’s counsel that the brief had not been timely filed, requested counsel to file a response concerning the failure to file the brief within ten days, and warned counsel

that the Court would abate and remand this cause to the trial court for appropriate findings

if a response was not filed. Counsel has nevertheless failed to file either a response or

an appellate brief in this matter.

Accordingly, we now ABATE this appeal and REMAND the cause to the trial court

for further proceedings pursuant to Rule 38.8(b)(2) and (3) of the Texas Rules of Appellate

Procedure. Upon remand, the trial court shall utilize whatever means necessary to make

appropriate findings and recommendations concerning the following: (1) whether

appellant desires to prosecute this appeal; (2) why appellant's counsel has failed to file a

brief and whether counsel has effectively abandoned the appeal; (3) whether appellant

has been denied effective assistance of counsel; (4) whether appellant's counsel should

be removed; and (5) whether appellant is indigent and entitled to court-appointed counsel.

If the trial court determines that appellant does want to continue the appeal, that

present counsel should be removed, and that appellant is indigent and entitled to

court-appointed counsel, the trial court shall appoint new counsel to represent appellant

in this appeal. If new counsel is appointed, the name, address, email address, telephone

number, and state bar number of said counsel shall be included in an order appointing

counsel.

The trial court shall cause its findings and recommendations, together with any

orders it may enter regarding the aforementioned issues, to be included in a supplemental

clerk's record. Furthermore, the trial court shall cause a supplemental reporter's record

of any proceedings to be prepared. The supplemental clerk's record and supplemental

2 reporter's record, if any, shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before the

expiration of thirty days from the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed The 8th day of July, 2015.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Russell Wayne McSland v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russell-wayne-mcsland-v-state-texapp-2015.